Dipankar Chakraborty v. Allahabad Bank and Ors. AIR 2017 Cal 289

The petitioner borrower in the present case had submitted that, he had enjoyed credit facilities from the bank. Since the bank had not acted in terms of its obligations, the petitioner was obliged to file a suit for damages being Money Suit No. 120 of 2000 before the learned City Civil Court at Calcutta against the bank. Furthermore, in the present scenario, the bank had not filed its claims within the time period of 30 days before the court due to which the veracity of their case got affected immensely. This was one ground on which the petitioner had approached the Court in the first instance.

Dipankar Chakraborty v. Allahabad Bank and Ors. AIR 2017 Cal 289 - (mylawyersadvice.com)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Case Analysis: Medical Negligence-Spring Meadows Hospital and Anr v. Harjol Ahluwalia and Anr. (1998) 4 SCC 39.

Top Ten Tips for Attracting Foreign Investments for Indian Start-Ups: Lawyers Advice

Relinquishment Deed & Transfer of Property by Non-Resident Indians (NRI)